What each one covers
Both start from the same idea: you paste the URL of your published site and the service analyzes it from the outside, read-only and without touching your code, looking for security, SEO and AI-visibility issues. Neither installs anything on your server or needs access to your repository for the basic scan. From there they part ways.
CheckVibe bets on breadth: over a hundred security checks, several dozen SEO checks and an AI-visibility matrix that looks engine by engine (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and others). It crawls several pages of your site on each scan, with a limit that grows with the plan, and since the summer of 2026 it has been adding team features: pull request reviews, automatic fixes delivered as PRs, dependency inventory, containers, clouds, single sign-on and integrations with Jira, Linear and Slack.
Scanaris keeps a shorter, deliberately explained catalog: 47 checks across eight pillars (security, SEO, AEO, performance, domain, email, accessibility and compliance), each with its own page saying exactly what it looks at, why it matters and how to fix it on each hosting. AI visibility is measured with a test against a model plus the checks for AI crawlers, llms.txt, structured data and content without JavaScript, with no per-engine matrix.
What the report looks like
This is the difference you notice most when using them. CheckVibe retired its numeric score in August 2026 and now counts issues by severity, with a confidence label on each finding (confirmed, likely, possible) and a workflow state to track them. It is a report designed for a team that will split the work.
Scanaris ranks everything by impact and sums up the state in a 0 to 100 score, with critical and high findings on top and the noise at the bottom. Every finding comes with a plain-language explanation and a fix prompt ready to paste into Cursor, Claude or whichever AI editor you use, written for someone who does not want to learn CSP syntax before fixing a header. The score also feeds the public badge you can put on your own site and the alert that tells you when it drops from one day to the next. If your site sits behind a firewall that blocks the scanner, the report is marked partial and the score is capped instead of inventing a pass.
Languages and who each one is for
CheckVibe works mainly in English. Scanaris is fully available in eight languages (English, Spanish, Portuguese, French, German, Italian, Dutch and Polish): the interface, the report, the guide for every check and the fix prompts. For anyone who does not read English comfortably, this alone settles the choice.
As for audience, CheckVibe has been moving towards teams and companies, with per-seat plans and governance features. Scanaris stays focused on solo builders and small agencies: someone who built an app with Lovable, Bolt, v0, Cursor or Replit, wants to know in thirty seconds whether anything serious is wrong, and wants to fix it the same afternoon.
Pricing (October 2026)
Entry prices are equivalent. CheckVibe dropped in July 2026 to 24, 49 and 99 dollars a month, with team plans at 25 and 50 dollars per seat and an enterprise offer. Its free plan shows half of the findings, with the critical ones blurred.
Scanaris costs 24, 49 and 99 euros a month (17, 34 and 69 if you pay yearly), and the free plan unlocks two or three real findings from one scan without showing the critical ones. On that point CheckVibe is more generous. In return, Scanaris's daily monitoring on the Pro plan does not consume your scan quota, re-verifying a finding after you fix it is free on every plan, and API and MCP server access are included from the first paid plan.
What each one does not do
- Scanaris does not offer pull request reviews, automatic fixes in your repository, per-container dependency inventory or task-manager integrations. It has no per-engine visibility matrix either. If you need those, CheckVibe has them.
- CheckVibe does not come in eight languages, does not give you a score or a badge, and its catalog takes longer to walk through for someone without experience. If you want a short list ranked by what matters, with the fix next to it, that is Scanaris.
- Neither replaces a manual pentest or executes your JavaScript like a browser. Both read what your site publishes and compare it against good practice.
How to choose
If you work in a team, want the largest number of checks and plan to wire the tool into your pull request flow, try CheckVibe first. If you ship alone or for clients, prefer a report you can read top to bottom without being an expert, and want it in your language, try Scanaris. Both scan in seconds and both have a free plan: the most honest comparison is to run the same URL through both and see which report gets you to a fix sooner. Before launching, the pre-launch security checklist covers what either of them will flag.
Frequently asked questions
Can I use both at the same time?
Yes. Both are read-only and do not interfere with each other. Many people run the same site through several scanners before a launch.
Which one finds more?
CheckVibe, by catalog size. More checks does not always mean more real problems: Scanaris picks the 47 that show up most often in AI-built apps and explains each one. If you care about the count, CheckVibe; if you care about the order, Scanaris.
Do they treat Supabase or Firebase security the same way?
Both detect the usual signals from the outside (reachable endpoints, keys in the JavaScript, permissive CORS). Scanaris additionally offers, on paid plans, an audit of your Supabase policies through a read-only connection, and has per-stack guides for Lovable, Bolt, v0, Cursor, Replit, Next.js, Supabase, Firebase and Vercel.